<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally, Resolutions Getting Up To Par!</title>
	<link>http://www.justinshattuck.com/2006/10/10/finally-resolutions-getting-up-to-par/</link>
	<description>mental diuretic</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.justinshattuck.com/2006/10/10/finally-resolutions-getting-up-to-par/#comment-665</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.justinshattuck.com/2006/10/10/finally-resolutions-getting-up-to-par/#comment-665</guid>
					<description>Actually, paying a bit of attention to the graph, you'll notice 1024x768 -- pretty much one step up from 800x600 is the primary resolution in use, at least by the visitors for my website.

However, I also average around 20,000 to 25,000 visitors per week.  So roughtly 8k of those users or so are using 1024x768.  Not too bad I guess, but its only one step up from 800x600.

I would really like to see say, 1280x *** take control!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, paying a bit of attention to the graph, you&#8217;ll notice 1024&#215;768 &#8212; pretty much one step up from 800&#215;600 is the primary resolution in use, at least by the visitors for my website.</p>
<p>However, I also average around 20,000 to 25,000 visitors per week.  So roughtly 8k of those users or so are using 1024&#215;768.  Not too bad I guess, but its only one step up from 800&#215;600.</p>
<p>I would really like to see say, 1280x *** take control!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.justinshattuck.com/2006/10/10/finally-resolutions-getting-up-to-par/#comment-664</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.justinshattuck.com/2006/10/10/finally-resolutions-getting-up-to-par/#comment-664</guid>
					<description>I use 1280x1024 and 1440x900

I don't like the 960 appearance, seems narrow to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use 1280&#215;1024 and 1440&#215;900</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the 960 appearance, seems narrow to me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.justinshattuck.com/2006/10/10/finally-resolutions-getting-up-to-par/#comment-659</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.justinshattuck.com/2006/10/10/finally-resolutions-getting-up-to-par/#comment-659</guid>
					<description>YEAH!  I'm in that 2.21 pct that uses 1280x960.  I like the way it looks.  I'm also very glad to see people have moved out of the dark ages of 800x600.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YEAH!  I&#8217;m in that 2.21 pct that uses 1280&#215;960.  I like the way it looks.  I&#8217;m also very glad to see people have moved out of the dark ages of 800&#215;600.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
